miRNA-211 stops the clock
Editorial

miRNA-211 stops the clock

Carmit Levy1, Tamar Golan1, David E. Fisher2

1Department of Human Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2Department of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to: David E. Fisher, MD, PhD. Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Bartlett 6, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Email: dfisher3@partners.org.

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Jin Li (Cardiac Regeneration and Ageing Lab, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China).

Comment on: Bu Y, Yoshida A, Chitnis N, et al. A PERK-miR-211 axis suppresses circadian regulators and protein synthesis to promote cancer cell survival. Nat Cell Biol 2018;20:104-15.


Received: 28 March 2018; Accepted: 11 April 2018; Published: 06 May 2018.

doi: 10.21037/ncri.2018.04.05


The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an essential mediator of cellular homeostasis and stress responses; it influences secreted protein synthesis, post-translation modification, and peptide folding (1). Environmental cues such as limited carbon sources, reduced oxygen, viral infections, metabolic imbalances, and cancer-related signaling may induce ER stress (2). ER stress results in accumulation of improperly folded proteins, and the unfolded protein response (UPR) is triggered to overcome the stress conditions (2). UPR signaling is initiated by three ER membrane-associated proteins: double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PERK, the transcription factor ATF6, and the transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease IRE1 (1). Stimulation of these transducers leads to translational attenuation, up-regulation of ER chaperones, protein degradation, and clearance of misfolded proteins by the proteasome (1). When the UPR pathway is insufficient to overcome the ER stress and fails to restore cellular homeostasis, the apoptosis system is activated (1).

Dysregulation of the UPR machinery is involved in diabetes and inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases (3). Further, the UPR has an established role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, as it sustains proliferation and promotes resistance to cell death. The UPR is also an inducer of metabolic changes, angiogenesis, and inflammation (4).

The circadian clock controls the daily regulation of biological functions and cellular homeostasis by driving rhythmic gene expression and protein translation (5). The heterodimeric transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 are the main coordinators of the circadian clock (5), and their mis-regulation, which leads to desynchronization of cellular rhythms, has been linked to metabolic pathologies (6) and cancer progression (7).

Although the UPR and the circadian clock serve similar physiological functions as cellular homeostasis keepers, whether or not there is a crosstalk between the circadian clock and the UPR is not clear. It was previously shown that the circadian clock rhythmically activates IRE1a to facilitate liver metabolism (8). A reciprocal relationship between the two systems, by which ER stress influences the clock, had not been demonstrated until recently when Bu et al. characterized a feedback regulation, governed by miRNA-211, from the UPR back to the circadian clock (9).

This worked started with the observation that ER stress results in a phase shift in central circadian clock regulators BMAL1 and CLOCK. A similar circadian phase shift was demonstrated in livers of PERK conditional knockout mice compared to wild-type mice, indicating that the circadian phase shift is PERK-dependent. Bu et al. found that genes downstream of the UPR exhibited a circadian oscillation pattern of expression, which strengthened their hypothesis of crosstalk between the two systems. Dark/light reversal activates UPR signaling, as demonstrated by alteration of expression in PERK-related genes, including miRNA-211 (10). It also perturbs the circadian oscillations of BMAL1 and CLOCK. Bu et al. hypothesized that miRNA-211 is the link between UPR and circadian oscillation. Indeed, they found that inhibition of miRNA-211 activity de-represses BMAL1 and CLOCK expression and restores circadian oscillation under the UPR condition. Further, miRNA-211 was found to directly repress the expression of both Bmal1 and Clock3.

Whereas Clock3 is repressed by miRNA-211 via the canonical post-transcriptional mechanism, Bmal1 is regulated at the transcriptional level. The promotor of Bmal1 contains miRNA-211 binding seed sequences, which leads to RNA-induced transcriptional silencing (RITS) (11). RITS is a newly discovered mechanism, best characterized in yeast and plants, by which miRNAs facilitate the recruitment of epigenetic modifiers to gene promotors leading to repression of gene expression. Bu et al. nicely demonstrated that miRNA-211 recruits Argonaute to the Bmal1 promotor, enhances H3K27me3 modification, and reduces RNA polymerase II occupancy, leading to transcriptional repression of Baml1. To prove a bi-directional communication between the UPR and circadian clock, the authors demonstrated that in response to ER stress, expression of Bmal1 inhibits UPR-dependent protein translation inhibition.

The authors also investigated the UPR-miRNA-211-circadian axis in the context of tumorigenesis. miRNA-211 has a well-established role in various pathologies (12-14) and plays a major role in melanoma development (15-18) and in development of other types of cancer including leukemia (19), glioblastoma (20), and breast cancer (21). In Burkitt’s lymphoma, a Myc-driven tumor, Bmal1/Clock and miRNA-211 expression patterns are inversely correlated. Treatment with a PERK inhibitor or anti-miRNA-211 restores circadian oscillation of Bmal1 and Clock and enhances expression of metabolic genes. From a physiological perspective, Baml1 re-expression increases cell sensitivity to ER stress, resulting in cell death. Bu et al. nicely showed that the newly discovered axis of ER stress-miRNA-211-circadian genes is relevant in various cancers including mammary carcinoma, neuroblastoma, cervical, colon, lung, and more. Patients with relatively high Bmal1 expression have a better survival rate than those with lower levels. The demonstration of this axis, the link between the UPR and the circadian clock, suggests new approaches to tumor therapy.

Melanoma is a melanocyte origin neoplasm, and miRNA-211 plays a key role in melanoma initiation and progression that may be related to its genomic location embedded within the intron of a lineage-restricted transporter gene (16,17). Sun exposure at a young age dramatically increases the risk for melanoma (22); however, the mechanism is not fully understood. The demonstration that miRNA-211 mediates crosstalk between the UPR and the circadian clock and is sensitive to dark/light reversal, suggests the possibility that miRNA-211 may have an as-yet uncharacterized role in melanoma initiation due to early sun exposure. Along the same lines, miRNA-211 might play a role in other light-sensitive medical conditions.


Acknowledgements

Funding: C Levy thanks the Cancer Biology Research Center at Tel Aviv University for grant support. DE Fisher acknowledges grant support from NIH (5P01 CA163222 and 2R01 AR043369) and the Dr. Miri and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Fisher has a financial interest in Soltego, Inc., a company developing SIK inhibitors for topical skin darkening treatments that might be used for a broad set of human applications. Dr. Fisher’s interests were reviewed and are managed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their conflict of interest policies.


References

  1. Schröder M, Kaufman RJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutation research 2005;569:29-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Diehl JA, Fuchs SY, Koumenis C. The cell biology of the unfolded protein response. Gastroenterology 2011;141:38-41, 41.e1-2.
  3. Kadowaki H, Nishitoh H. Signaling pathways from the endoplasmic reticulum and their roles in disease. Genes 2013;4:306-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Papaioannou A, Chevet E. Driving Cancer Tumorigenesis and Metastasis Through UPR Signaling. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2018;414:159-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Buhr ED, Takahashi JS. Molecular components of the Mammalian circadian clock. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2013.3-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Bass J, Takahashi JS. Circadian integration of metabolism and energetics. Science 2010;330:1349-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Altman BJ. Cancer Clocks Out for Lunch: Disruption of Circadian Rhythm and Metabolic Oscillation in Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol 2016;4:62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Cretenet G, Le Clech M, Gachon F. Circadian clock-coordinated 12 Hr period rhythmic activation of the IRE1alpha pathway controls lipid metabolism in mouse liver. Cell Metab 2010;11:47-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Bu Y, Yoshida A, Chitnis N, et al. A PERK-miR-211 axis suppresses circadian regulators and protein synthesis to promote cancer cell survival. Nat Cell Biol 2018;20:104-15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Chitnis NS, Pytel D, Bobrovnikova-Marjon E, et al. miR-211 is a prosurvival microRNA that regulates chop expression in a PERK-dependent manner. Mol Cell 2012;48:353-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Martienssen R, Moazed D. RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015;7:a019323. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Bekenstein U, Mishra N, Milikovsky DZ, et al. Dynamic changes in murine forebrain miR-211 expression associate with cholinergic imbalances and epileptiform activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114:E4996-5005. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Wang S, Li Z, Chen Q, et al. NF-κB-Induced MicroRNA-211 Inhibits Interleukin-10 in Macrophages of Rats with Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018;45:332-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Belaya Z, Grebennikova T, Melnichenko GA, et al. Effects of active acromegaly on bone mRNA and microRNA expression patterns. Eur J Endocrinol 2018;178:353-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Babapoor S, Horwich M, Wu R, et al. microRNA in situ hybridization for miR-211 detection as an ancillary test in melanoma diagnosis. Mod Pathol 2016;29:461-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Dror S, Sander L, Schwartz H, et al. Melanoma miRNA trafficking controls tumour primary niche formation. Nat Cell Biol 2016;18:1006-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Levy C, Khaled M, Iliopoulos D, et al. Intronic miR-211 assumes the tumor suppressive function of its host gene in melanoma. Mol Cell 2010;40:841-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Mazar J, Qi F, Lee B, et al. MicroRNA 211 Functions as a Metabolic Switch in Human Melanoma Cells. Mol Cell Biol 2016;36:1090-108. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Cha JA, Song HS, Kang B, et al. miR-211 Plays a Critical Role in Cnidium officinale Makino Extract-Induced, ROS/ER Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in U937 and U266 Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Yang C, Zheng J, Xue Y, et al. The Effect of MCM3AP-AS1/miR-211/KLF5/AGGF1 Axis Regulating Glioblastoma Angiogenesis. Front Mol Neurosci 2018;10:437. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Li X, Wang S, Li Z, et al. The lncRNA NEAT1 facilitates cell growth and invasion via the miR-211/HMGA2 axis in breast cancer. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;105:346-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Zaidi MR, Davis S, Noonan FP, et al. Interferon-gamma links ultraviolet radiation to melanomagenesis in mice. Nature 2011;469:548-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/ncri.2018.04.05
Cite this article as: Levy C, Golan T, Fisher DE. miRNA-211 stops the clock. Non-coding RNA Investig 2018;2:25.