Shades of microRNAs: new biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke?
Editorial

Shades of microRNAs: new biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke?

Klaus T. Preissner

Department of Biochemistry, Medical School, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany

Correspondence to: Klaus T. Preissner, PhD. Department of Biochemistry, Medical School, Justus-Liebig-University, Friedrichstrasse 24, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Email: klaus.t.preissner@biochemie.med.uni-giessen.de.

Comment on: Tiedt S, Prestel M, Malik R, et al. RNA-Seq Identifies Circulating miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-143-3p as Potential Biomarkers for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Circ Res 2017;121:970-80.


Received: 22 October 2017; Accepted: 17 November 2017; Published: 18 November 2017.

doi: 10.21037/ncri.2017.10.02


Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major worldwide life-threatening pathology

AIS is a thrombotic syndrome, which is the result of a reduced or an interrupted blood flow to the brain, culminating in cell death, whereby approx two million neurons and 14 billion synapses are lost during each minute of stroke. According to the World Health Organization, 15 million people worldwide suffer stroke each year, and of these, 5 million die and another 5 million are permanently disabled as a result. Thus, stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and ranks second after ischemic heart disease as a cause of death worldwide. Although the incidence of stroke is on the decline in developed countries, largely due to efforts to lower blood pressure and reduce smoking, the overall rate of stroke is increasing exponentially due to an ever-aging population (1).

In Western societies, about 80–85% of AIS are mediated by focal cerebral ischemia due to arterial occlusion by a thrombus that prevents oxygen supply to the brain, whereby 15–20% of cases are caused by leakage or rupture of blood vessels thereby provoking hemorrhagic stroke. If the blood flow to a portion of the brain is partially blocked and disability symptoms only last for a short period of time, this “mini-stroke” is known as a “transient ischemic attack” (TIA). Arterial occlusion in AIS is most commonly embolic: either cardio-embolic, from causes such as atrial fibrillation or valvular heart disease, or arterio-embolic, from atherosclerotic plaque rupture in the extracranial cervical carotid or vertebral artery. In contrast, acute coronary syndromes are mainly due to the rupture or erosion of an athero-sclerotic plaque, followed by in situ thrombus formation as a typical wound-healing response, which in turn causes arterial obstruction (2). In any respect, there is a very large gap between the vast number of stroke patients with the adverse consequences for public health worldwide and the lack of appropriate measures for diagnosis and prognosis in AIS.

While the main risk factor for AIS is high blood pressure, other predetermined conditions such as smoking, obesity, high blood cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation are risk situations as well and contribute to the onset of disease. Diagnosis is typically performed with computer-tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans along with a physical examination and blood tests to determine any risk factors and rule out other possible causes. Yet, only in about half of the AIS patients can any abnormalities be detected using these imaging techniques. AIS is an emergency situation for the affected patient as well as for the healthcare team in charge: This not only calls for a fast treatment modality, currently using fibrinolytic agents such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), to remove the thrombus as “time is tissue”, but it also requires safe diagnosis and prognosis options which are equally important and urgently needed (3). Despite the fact that AIS is an unpredictable event in the majority of cases, and up to 40% of all strokes are cryptogenic, specific (prognostic) blood biomarkers for AIS are currently not available. Here, a recent report in Circulation Research (4) which promotes circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as potential biomarkers for AIS, may re-address this situation.


Circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for disease

Since the identification of the first small non-coding RNA in 1993, our knowledge about miRNAs has vastly increased, and their potential use as markers of disease diagnosis and prognosis, and as new drugs or therapeutic targets has been developed in several fields of medicine (4). miRNAs are short (20–25 nt) non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by affecting both the translation and stability of miRNAs. miRNAs are also released into the extracellular milieu by many cell types, including platelets, predominantly with the help of micro-vesicles, or in association with RNA-binding proteins to protect the miRNAs against degradation by RNases. Using this horizontal transfer route, circulating miRNAs can thus be taken up by target cells where they may trigger post-transcriptional regulation as well. Due to their remarkable stability in body fluids and the relative ease of detection, circulating miRNAs appear to be the ideal tools for rapid and non-invasive diagnosis if their extracellular levels can be associated or correlated directly or indirectly with the cause or consequence of the disease or the pathological situation.

In particular, a multitude of miRNAs are expressed in the cardiovascular system, and a growing body of experimental evidence supports the significant contribution of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of neo-intimal lesion formation, atherosclerosis or ischemic heart disease (5-10). Although platelets are anucleate blood cells and are no longer able to generate RNAs de novo, they are major contributors to cardiovascular disease development and thrombus formation. Yet, they contain a large number of RNA species (inherited from megakaryocytes), including premature and mature miRNAs, which are released upon conditions of platelet activation and aggregation (11-13). Nevertheless, for the purpose of diagnosis, miRNA measurements need to be standardized in and across different patient cohorts also by ruling out or minimizing confounder effects; the miRNA stability in samples may be increased by adding RNase inhibitor, and preparation of plasma or serum samples is a critical issue due to the contribution of platelet-derived miRNAs in the latter one.


Circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for AIS

In their comprehensive investigation, Tiedt et al. (3) reported on the identification of three differentially regulated circulating miRNAs after ASI, using RNA sequencing for discovery and subsequent validation and replication of results in different patient cohorts, and further combining these data with experimental studies in animal models. The self-critical analysis of this step-wise approach included a relatively small group of 20 ASI patients (vs. 20 healthy subjects) for discovery, 40 patients and 40 controls for validation, and a larger group of 200 ASI patients and 100 controls for replication. Together, miRNAs 125a-5p, 125b-5p and 143-3p were singled out from this elaborated approach and were proposed as potential biomarkers for ASI. Moreover, longitudinal analysis of miRNA levels revealed that all three miRNAs showed maximal levels during the first week following the event (particularly on day 1), but not after 90 days. Interestingly, the authors found correlations between elevated miRNA levels and large vessel stroke, cardio-embolic stroke and AIS of undefined pathogenesis, but no correlation with infarct volume. Using ex vivo experiments with isolated platelets they further claim that platelets are a major source of the identified miRNAs, thereby contributing to the increase of these biomarkers in patient blood plasma. Although this study provides new and comprehensive aspects as to the use of circulating miRNAs in the diagnosis of AIS, which lacks appropriate protein or low molecular weight biomarkers, a number of issues need to be clarified and resolved before such a diagnostic approach can enter clinical practice.

In an editorial by Karakas and Zeller (14) in association with the original report, constructive comments were raised that should be taken into consideration by follow-up investigations in this area. The issues include the following aspects: (I) larger cohorts with less selected groups need to be studied to reflect the real-world scenario of non-selected patients, including independent and prospective sample analysis; (II) further efforts in the standardization of miRNA analysis need to be accomplished, since due to various causes of stroke, the repertoire of differentially regulated and circulating miRNA may differ considerably, calling for normalization strategies to avoid the generation of data artifacts. It remains totally unclear at present, whether the three indicated “platelet-derived” miRNAs are really of megakaryocyte origin or derived from other cellular sources and then become taken up by blood platelets during their life-time. Thus, the clarification of causal relationships between such miRNAs and different predetermining situations for AIS should be characterized experimentally; (III) although in the present report a certain biomarker signature of three miRNAs was put forward, it remains to be demonstrated whether this or another signature (including non-miRNA biomarkers) may be applicable under daily routine clinical conditions. Moreover, what is the outcome of biomarker analysis in those patients who lack abnormalities on admission computed tomographic scans, currently the gold standard for diagnostic evaluation?


Perspectives

Additional mechanistic insights for the indicated three miRNAs may come from studies on their expression and regulation in disease, whereby (I) miRNA-125a-5p was previously shown to be associated with deleterious effects of ox-LDL on brain endothelial cells (15), (II) miRNA-125b-5p expression demonstrated associations with classical risk factors for coronary heart disease (16), and (III) miRNA-143 appears to be a predictive factor for in-stent restenosis in arterial thrombosis (17). Conversely, from a functional point of view, the pathophysiological basis for the appearance of miRNA-143-3p, miRNA-125a-5p and miRNA-125b-5p derived from platelets as the proposed major source has not yet been solved. Although platelet activation and aggregation are involved in most of the cardiovascular diseases associated with thrombus formation, the three indicated miRNAs were not recognized as markers in a recent study concerned with acute coronary syndrome (18).

Finally, the contribution of neutrophils in thrombus formation at various sites, including cerebral occlusions, has recently been appreciated (19). A hallmark of neutrophil activation, particularly promoted by platelets in a bidirectional manner to favor thrombosis, is the generation of “neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)”. They represent the extracellular decompensated nuclear DNA-histone network of neutrophils that becomes expelled upon cellular activation and that provides a potent pro-coagulant surface (20). NETs are further characterized by associated proteolytic enzymes as well as by citrullinated histone 3, a protein modification which is required for the generation of NETs (21). Interestingly enough, in AIS patients, NETs were identified in plasma as well as in ischemic stroke thrombi (19,22), indicative for the fact that NETs may serve as a new (prognostic) biomarker for AIS. Yet, further clinical studies need to demonstrate and validate this hypothesis. Since arterial as well as venous thrombi that contain considerable quantities of NETs have been shown to be susceptible towards DNase treatment (23,24), it is proposed that the treatment of ASI patients with a combination of t-PA and DNase instead of standard t-PA alone may yield a more efficient lytic therapy with reduced unwanted bleeding side effects (19,25).


Acknowledgments

Funding: The work of the author has been supported by grants from the Excellence Cluster Cardio-pulmonary System (ECCPS) (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany), the LOEWE network “Medical RNAomics” (Wiesbaden, Germany) and the Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University (Kazan, Russian Federation).


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by Section Editor Qiying Dai (Metrowest Medical Center, Framingham, US).

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ncri.2017.10.02). The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Cassella CR, Jagoda A. Ischemic stroke: Advances in diagnosis and management. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2017;35:911-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Musuka TD, Wilton SB, Traboulsi M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke: speed is critical. CMAJ 2015;187:887-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Tiedt S, Prestel M, Malik R, et al. RNA-Seq identifies circulating miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-143-3p as potential biomarkers for acute ischemic stroke. Circ Res 2017;121:970-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Almeida MI, Reis RM, Calin GA. MicroRNA history: discovery, recent applications, and next frontiers. Mutat Res 2011;717:1-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Weber C, Schober A, Zernecke A. MicroRNAs in arterial remodelling, inflammation and atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets 2010;11:950-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Small EM, Olson EN. Pervasive roles of microRNAs in cardiovascular biology. Nature 2011;469:336-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Ji R, Cheng Y, Yue J, et al. MicroRNA expression signature and antisense-mediated depletion reveal an essential role of microRNA in vascular neointimal lesion formation. Circ Res 2007;100:1579-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Rayner KJ, Fernandez-Hernando C, Moore KJ. MicroRNAs regulating lipid metabolism in atherogenesis. Thromb Haemost 2012;107:642-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Malik R, Mushtaque RS, Siddiqui UA, et al. Association between coronary artery disease and microRNA: Literature review and clinical perspective. Cureus 2017;9:e1188 [PubMed]
  10. Lima J Jr, Batty JA, Sinclair H, et al. MicroRNAs in ischemic heart disease: From pathophysiology to potential clinical applications. Cardiol Rev 2017;25:117-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Elgheznawy A, Fleming I. Platelet-enriched microRNAs and cardiovascular homeostasis. Antioxid Redox Signal 2017; [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Provost P. The clinical significance of platelet microparticle-associated microRNAs. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:657-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Sunderland N, Skroblin P, Barwari T, et al. MicroRNA biomarkers and platelet reactivity: The clot thickens. Circ Res 2017;120:418-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Karakas M, Zeller T. A biomarker ocular: Circulating microRNAs toward diagnostics for acute ischemic stroke. Circ Res 2017;121:905-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Pan Q, Liao X, Liu H, et al. MicroRNA-125a-5p alleviates the deleterious effects of ox-LDL on multiple functions of human brain microvessel endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2017;312:C119-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Ding XQ, Ge PC, Liu Z, et al. Interaction between microRNA expression and classical risk factors in the risk of coronary heart disease. Sci Rep 2015;5:14925. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Yu ZH, Wang HT, Tu C. Diagnostic value of microRNA-143 in predicting in-stent restenosis for patients with lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. Eur J Med Res 2017;22:2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Karakas M, Schulte C, Appelbaum S, et al. Circulating microRNAs strongly predict cardiovascular death in patients with coronary artery disease-results from the large AtheroGene study. Eur Heart J 2017;38:516-23. [PubMed]
  19. Laridan E, Denorme F, Desender L, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemic stroke thrombi. Ann Neurol 2017;82:223-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:15880-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR, et al. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 2010;207:1853-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Vallés J, Lago A, Santos MT, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are increased in patients with acute ischemic stroke: prognostic significance. Thromb Haemost 2017;117:1919-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Massberg S, Grahl L, von Bruehl ML, et al. Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nature Med 2010;16:887-96. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. von Brühl ML, Stark K, Steinhart A, et al. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J Exp Med 2012;209:819-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Mangold A, Alias S, Scherz T, et al. Coronary neutrophil extracellular trap burden and deoxyribonuclease activity in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are predictors of ST-segment resolution and infarct size. Circ Res 2015;116:1182-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/ncri.2017.10.02
Cite this article as: Preissner KT. Shades of microRNAs: new biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke? Non-coding RNA Investig 2017;1:21.

Download Citation